PDA

View Full Version : Hot-Air Artist: DVDs vs. 1994 Sci-Fi Channel reruns


Rick_66
04-09-2009, 10:44 PM
Now we come to an episode which has some ups and downs, “Hot-Air Artist.”

And of course the Sci-Fi Channel made cuts. Some minor, some a bit more significant.

The first cut occurs after Jack has met Col. Post and the two of them encounter Grumpy. The Sci-Fi channel version does not include the brief scene of Jack distracting Grumpy by using small tree as a catapult to send a boulder crashing into the jungle. While the loss of that scene doesn’t affect the episode per se, it does undercut any degree of threat Grumpy might represent. In the Sci-Fi Channel version, Grumpy might well be a Sleestak trying to fire a crossbow bolt with any degree of accuracy.

The next cut takes place a moment later. The Sci-Fi Channel also excised Jack’s line regarding the headlines Post envisions: “Instead of strangers, could you make that ‘The Marshall family’?”

The Sci-Fi Channel also cut most of the dialogue between the Sleestak leader and the Skull of (dubious) Wisdom regarding this new intruder in the Land of the Lost. In the Sci-Fi Channel version, everything between the Sleestak leader saying “the Sleestak are frightened.” and his asking “How do we protect ourselves from his power?” is gone. This includes the questions and answers regarding whether this intruder is an “evil god” and whether he means the Sleestak any harm.

Personally, I think that scene shouldn’t have been included in the aired episode to begin with. As I said some years ago in another thread, not knowing why the Sleestak attacked would have been more in keeping with the element of the unknown they once represented.

The uncut version does provide a motivation of sorts that’s missing from the Sci-Fi Channel version: The Skull of (dubious) Wisdom gives double talk answers to the questions regarding whether Post is an evil god and whether he intends harm; answers which they interpret as “yes” to both questions.

In the Sci-Fi Channel version, no explanation is given as to why the Sleestak are frightened of Post’s “power.” And if that’s the case, they might as well have cut the whole scene. True, viewers of the Sci-Fi Channel version wouldn’t have known why the Sleestak attacked, but as I said, it maintains an aura of the unknown about them.

Besides, later scenes that were cut could then have been left alone.

The next cut come when Holly and Cha-Ka show Post the Lost City. Their lines stating that the Sleestak live underground and can’t stand light or heat anymore got the ax in the Sci-Fi Channel version. Frankly, the loss of those lines don’t hurt the episode.

The next cut comes in the scene when Post is telling Cha-Ka all about the wonders he’ll see. Everything is cut between Post saying ““Europe, South America, the mysterious Orient” and “wait till you see Paris, London and New York.” This includes the lines about meeting Kings and emperors; descriptions of technological marvels such as electric lights, cars that go 40 MPH (as fast as that?! Wow!), trains, 20-story skyscrapers; and Cha-Ka’s questions about whether Pakuni live in cities.

In the Sci-Fi Channel version, Cha-Ka hears a list of place names that would have no meaning to him. Col. Post could have listed the names of Department stores— say, Hudson’s, Kern’s and Jacobson’s— and gotten the same reaction. In the uncut version, Post entices Cha-Ka with descriptions of remarkable devices and talk of meeting people. In the Sci-Fi Channel version, beyond the fact that Cha-Ka likes it when people listen to him speak, why he would seem so interested in Post’s “sales pitch” isn’t clear.

The next cut comes when the Marshalls are getting ready to make their last meal in the LOTL. The Sci-Fi Channel excised Cha-Ka’s offer to make stone soup, along with Holly’s reply. A minor cut, all in all, but the “stone soup” line was an oblique reference to the pre-Jack era. That, the events of “After-Shock” and the reference to Rick in “Survival Kit” were pretty much the only indication (outside of the opening credits) that any of the events of the first two seasons ever took place.

Again, losing the “stone soup” line doesn’t affect the episode per se, but it is a nice reminder to the viewer that there is some degree of continuity between the first two seasons and the third; that season three isn’t entirely a stand-alone season, unconnected to what went before.

The next cut comes when Jack confronts Post about Cha-Ka. In the Sci-Fi Channel version, we lose Jack’s statement that he’s worried about Cha-Ka; that they can’t leave him in the Land of the Lost, unprotected, without any of his own kind. Instead, the conversation begins with the second part of Jack’s statement, that he understands Post plans to exhibit Cha-Ka.

The Sci-Fi Channel also cut Post’s reply beyond “you’ve mistaken my intentions.” Gone is his claim that his goals are purely scientific and altruistic.

The significance of this scene in the uncut version is that it explains why the Marshalls would consider taking Cha-Ka along in the first place (the 1970s probably wouldn’t have been very friendly to him, but the 1920s would have been even less so). In the Sci-Fi Channel version it’s just a given that Cha-Ka will go with them. Which doesn’t really make sense unless it’s made clear that the Marshalls don’t believe he can survive in the Land of the Lost on his own.

The final cut is Will’s line that he will never say last anything in his life, ever again. A minor cut, truth be known.

So, to summarize, short of leaving the episode entirely uncut, the Sci-Fi Channel should have cut the entire Sleestak/Skull of Wisdom scene and left the rest (especially the scenes with Post and Cha-ka and Post and Jack about Cha-Ka) intact.

Next time, the penultimate episode in this series of reviews: “Timestop.”

Rick

Professor
04-10-2009, 04:42 AM
I suspect that if the Sleestak discussions hadn't been included, we'd have stricken the episode down for having random Sleestak attacks. All other times that the Sleestak were menacing and we hadn't seen their deliberations, their motives were nonetheless clear either from context or from subsequent discussion.

Not a good story anyway.

Rick_66
04-10-2009, 07:31 AM
I suspect that if the Sleestak discussions hadn't been included, we'd have stricken the episode down for having random Sleestak attacks. All other times that the Sleestak were menacing and we hadn't seen their deliberations, their motives were nonetheless clear either from context or from subsequent discussion.

Not a good story anyway.



So instead of the Sleestak with the Skull of (dubious) Wisdom scene, we could have had a scene where Post asks why the Sleestak would attack when neither he nor the Marshalls have made any hostile moves against them. And the Marshalls could have replied something to the effect that the Sleestak often attack with no apparent provocation.

That bit aside, I see what you mean about it not being a good story. How could it be, with neither Medusa nor Malak around?

Seriously, the episode could have been greatly improved (as I said on another thread some time back) if we'd seen an open time doorway in the sky, and if said time doorway was visibly closing, giving the Marshalls and Col. Post a deadline to fight against. My own theory is that Col. Post either sailed through an (unseen) still open time doorway, or met an untimely end somewhere in the LOTL, but it'd have been nice to have seen said doorway, even once. We would have in either the first or second season; and with a few tweaks, this episode could have aired in either of those seasons.

As a third season episode, it ranks somewhere in the middle, not as bad as "Medusa", but not as good as "Timestop." But again, showing a time doorway would have greatly improved it.

One thing I did like was Will and Jack's discussion as to when they'd end up. A rare third season reminder that the Marshalls aren't marooned in just the strictly geographic sense. I honestly don't recall any similar discussion taking place in "Flying Dutchman." And they must have noticed that the captain wasn't wearing contemporary clothes.

Rick

Professor
04-10-2009, 03:14 PM
The principal problem with this story is the ridiculous premise of someone flying in and then just being able to fly out. The last time someone flew in ("Hurricane") it took a substantial amount of discovery and effort to get him back out. This time, all he has to do is get airborne. So from my point of view, the problem goes well beyond not showing the time doorway; I don't think there was actually meant to be one.

Galilee55
04-10-2009, 08:31 PM
I'm definitely NOT defending the writers here, but I would say that had the Marshall's had the baloon in Hurricane, they probably would have been able to leave. The whole problem was that they had no way to get down to earth had they gone with Jackson.

Also, I've said this before, but I like the fact that the Marshalls tried to get out of the Land of the Lost. In many of the 3rd season episodes (Survival Kit, Ancient Guardian, Abominable Snowman, Scarab, Cornered, The Orb), it seems like the thought of trying to escape never even occours to them.

But, despite that plus, I agree that it is a poor episode.

Rick_66
04-11-2009, 04:28 PM
The principal problem with this story is the ridiculous premise of someone flying in and then just being able to fly out. The last time someone flew in ("Hurricane") it took a substantial amount of discovery and effort to get him back out. This time, all he has to do is get airborne. So from my point of view, the problem goes well beyond not showing the time doorway; I don't think there was actually meant to be one.

I agree that as depicted in the third season Post's balloon could just fly in and out-- sans time doorway-- as if the LOTL were in some remote area on Earth; not unlike Burrough's Lost World. I'm just saying that showing a time doorway (something I believe we would have seen in either season 1 or 2) would have improved the episode by visually showing us that Post wouldn't just be flying out. It's something that should have been there.

Compared to episodes from the first two seasons, "Hot-Air Artist" (written by third season producer Jon Kubichan) is by no means a good episode; but as I said, taking the third season by itself, it ranks somewhere in the middle. I think we can all agree that episodes like "Medusa" and "Scarab" are worse. At least "Hot-Air Artist" had a scene regarding the possibility of time travel by the Marshalls. "Hot-Air Artist" was certainly closer to science fiction than either of those two episodes.

Rick

Professor
04-11-2009, 05:07 PM
I'm just saying that showing a time doorway (something I believe we would have seen in either season 1 or 2) would have improved the episode by visually showing us that Post wouldn't just be flying out.I understand what you're saying, but it's a bit like saying that since caviar is so good, those miserable souls in Darfur should get some. My point is that the writers and editors didn't simply choose not to show a time doorway. It never occurred to them that they should even consider one, and as such, it wasn't an option.Compared to episodes from the first two seasons, "Hot-Air Artist" (written by third season producer Jon Kubichan) is by no means a good episode; but as I said, taking the third season by itself, it ranks somewhere in the middle. I think we can all agree that episodes like "Medusa" and "Scarab" are worse.I wish I had your ability to view Season 3 without comparing it to the first two seasons, but I cannot. Since Season 3 is something I never would have been interested in watching if it existed only on its own, it must, for me, always be compared with Seasons 1 and 2. And no, I like "Scarab" a lot better.

Rick_66
04-13-2009, 08:00 AM
My point is that the writers and editors didn't simply choose not to show a time doorway. It never occurred to them that they should even consider one, and as such, it wasn't an option.


Well, Kubichan apparently knew about time doorways, because he used one to explain Rick's absence; but yeah, other writers brought in just for the third season probably weren't aware that one would have been needed (either seen or mentioned) to explain Col. Post's presence. Doesn't change the fact that had somebody said "hey, we need to show a time doorway" (and who knows? Maybe one of the actors did, but was ignored), the episode would have improved. In short, it's not that they opted not to have a time doorway in the episode, it's that either that no one familiar with the established "rules" brought it up or he or she was ignored.


I wish I had your ability to view Season 3 without comparing it to the first two seasons, but I cannot. Since Season 3 is something I never would have been interested in watching if it existed only on its own, it must, for me, always be compared with Seasons 1 and 2. And no, I like "Scarab" a lot better.


I agree that all three seasons should be viewed as a set, but I'm reasonably certain that Kubichan, et al. would have liked to have divorced season 3 from seasons 1 & 2 as much as possible. Not only is Rick never mentioned again in an episode after "Survival Kit", but Ta and Sa aren't mentioned at all. If a viewer's first episode is "After-Shock", he or she would have no idea how many Pakuni there were before Cha-Ka got separated from them. Or what his relationship was to them. Then there's the various mythological elements introduced in season 3; and the lack of any mention of the LOTL being a closed universe.

And, of course, most of the really bad episodes are in season 3. So if you compare the various bad episodes (which tend to congregate in season 3), "Hot-Air Artist" is, to quote the Shangri-Las, "good bad, but (it's) not evil."

Or put another way, if we didn't have DVDs and season 3 were the only season being shown in re-runs for some reason, "Hot-Air Artist" would fall somewhere in the middle.

If you hadn't seen Land of the Lost in many years, and there were no DVDs, would you have watched season 3 if it showed up somewhere in re-runs, because it was Land of the Lost; or not watched it, because it was season 3? Myself, I'd have watched if the episode had been either "After-Shock" or "Timestop." As to any others, I'm not really sure. Probably would have depended on my mood (or a flip of a coin). I doubt I'd have made it a point to tune in every week, however.

While I'm not a fan of "Scarab", in retrospect "Abominable Snowman" would probably have been a better example for me to have used.

Rick

Professor
04-13-2009, 09:39 AM
Well, Kubichan apparently knew about time doorways, because he used one to explain Rick's absence...It was convenient to use the time doorway the once, but I suspect that they were motivated to deliberately avoid reference to time doorways subsequently. It was a different direction.If you hadn't seen Land of the Lost in many years, and there were no DVDs, would you have watched season 3 if it showed up somewhere in re-runs, because it was Land of the Lost; or not watched it, because it was season 3?When I first got the DVDs, I was excited to see Season 3 because I thought it couldn't have been as bad as I remembered. I was wrong.While I'm not a fan of "Scarab", in retrospect "Abominable Snowman" would probably have been a better example for me to have used.Agreed. But I still rank this particular episode lower than you do, I think.